Trainee Arbiter Report Form Download form
Please complete the following:
Surname of candidate | Forename(s) |
| |
Name of Event/Congress | Tournament supervised | Type of event e.g. rapidplay/swiss blitz/APA | Nos of players |
| | | |
Start Date: | Finish Date: | Supervising Arbiter | Nos of rounds |
| | | |
Please tick the most appropriate box for each heading.
Knowledge of Laws:
Good knowledge of the Laws and confident manner | Good knowledge of the Laws but not totally confident | Knowledge of the Laws could do with improvement | Unsatisfactory knowledge of the Laws |
| | | |
Additional Comments ………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………….
……………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Knowledge of Pairing Rules:
Satisfactory pairings achieved within timescale | Satisfactory pairings achieved but time taken could affected round start | Would benefit from more practice on pairings. Minor pairing problems | Pairing rules require more study. Several inaccurate pairings. |
| | | |
Additional Comments ………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………….
……………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Objectivity:
Totally competent and unbiased | Hesitant but generally sound | Could be intimidated by certain players | Appeared to favour friends/clubmates |
| | | |
Additional Comments ………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………….
……………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Ability to deal with incidents (e.g. time scrambles/awkward players, 10.2 cases):
Remained calm and confident | Required some support or reassurance | Did not cope with situation | No situations arose |
| | | |
Additional Comments ………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………….
……………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Ability to ensure adequate environment (noise control, lighting etc):
Maintained excellent playing conditions throughout | Maintained adequate playing conditions | Improvement required in this area | Made no attempt to control environment |
| | | |
Additional Comments ………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………….
……………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Recommendation:
The candidate met the required standard | |
The candidate was satisfactory but would benefit from more experience | |
The candidate needs a little more experience but showed promise | |
The candidate was not of the required standard | |
Signature of supervising arbiter ……………………………………………………… Date …………….